‘Support Women In Workplace To Increase Birthrate’, Says Abe

The Prime Minister poses with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momoiro_Clover_Z" target="_blank">Momoiro Clover Z</a> at a recent cherry-blossom viewing.

The Prime Minister poses with Momoiro Clover Z at a recent cherry-blossom viewing.

Ranked 101st out of 135 countries in terms of gender equality in a recent report, Japan doesn’t have the best track record when it comes to equality between men and women.

However, as the tax burden of supporting a growing elderly population increases year by year, it’s becoming pretty hard to ignore that, at least for pragmatic reasons, the other half of the working-age tax-paying population needs to be given more opportunities.

One person who especially can’t afford to ignore this is Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, as he pointed out in a recent statement.

From Yahoo! News:

Prime Minister Abe To Support Female Workforce… Aims For “No Waiting Lists For Childcare”, “3-Year Childcare Leave”

Talking about how women in the workforce are a key part of the administration’s economic growth strategy, Prime Minister Abe stated on the April 19 that he will offer broad support to “abolishing waiting lists for childcare” and “extending childcare leave from 1 to 3 years”.

As many as 25,000 children are on waiting lists for day-care and it’s become a serious problem. Abe stated that he wanted to follow the same methods as Yokohama which has already managed to get rid of waiting lists for childcare. He indicated that he wanted to cut waiting times for daycare and see 20,000 children accepted in daycares in 2013/2014 and 40,000 accepted by 2017.

According to a survey, more women say that they “quit on their own accord to devote themselves to childcare and housework” than “it was hard to balance both [childcare] and work”. About 60% of women also said that they would like to take longer than the 1 year of recognized work leave for child or nursing care. A further 30% say they want to devote themselves entirely to raising their children until about the age of 3.

This is why Prime Minister Abe asked the 3 main Japanese economic federations [i.e. the Japan Association of Corporate Executives, the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Japan Business Federation] to offer their support to the “3 year child-care leave” not because it’s the law but out of their own choice.

Furthermore, Prime Minister Abe said that “The experience of being able to focus on raising a child is also a precious experience in life”, and said that he would initiate new internship projects and trial employment for those who had been focusing on raising their children for long periods of time, and would support their re-employment in the workplace.

You can see Abe’s full speech on women in the work place from 32:00 onward in the video of his “Economic Growth Strategy Speech”.

Comments from Yahoo! News:

ぶりぶりさん:

I think they should stop now the cost ‘cause the cost of 3 year of childcare would just be too high.
If you think of the labor costs of having someone go back to same job after 3 years, you obviously won’t hesitate to replace your workforce with new joiners in the meantime.
Getting rid of waiting lists for day care would probably be a good thing today.
But when parents work full time, the kids are all alone at breakfast, lunch and dinner.
I personally just think “what?” when it looks like a kid is being brought up on frozen food and ready-meals.
The point is, you can make a living on just you husband’s income and aren’t families where the mom is not doing overtime and makes home cooked meals the best?

mog*mog*_*564さん:

Within three years you could already be on to the next kid, couldn’t you? My sister in law is already at her 4th child. You need to think of the burden on the company!

MIX_KIX160さん:

You can see the sparkly hallow behind the Prime Minister…..

鬼殺しさん:

It’s just something I heard but apparently some famous company tried to implement a 3 year childcare leave policy a while back and it was a big failure.
Now they brushed up their system and it seems to be going well though.
The government isn’t doing much to help general industry (笑)

でっていうさん:

Some men also take childcare-leave. In the U.S. and Europe it seems like that is pretty common. I think that’s good.
Even if it’s hard to take large blocks of time off work, isn’t there some other way, like 3 day working-weeks, or work half-days or something like that?

ブロジーIN巨欅さん:

Make an environment where it’s okay for men to go on childcare-leave.

HASEsan(has…)さん:

If you have 3 years for each and you have 2 kids, that’s about 5 years of childcare leave isn’t it? That’s exactly like Urashima Tarō. [N.B. A Japanese folktale about a fisherman who disappears under the sea for 300 years then comes back to find that his village has completely changed.]

i_a*_a_*at_**aped*robo*さん:

Do they also wanting to put in place a one child policy by backing 3 year [child-leave]? Companies shouldn’t bear the burden if women think about having another kid. This seems as if it would push female employment even further.

MIX_KIX160さん:

You can definitely see Seiko’s shadow fluttering behind the Prime Minister.

まいけるさん:

And what about policies to tackle low birth rates?

ルナさん:

3 years? And if your second kid is born at the end of those 3 years, do you get another 3 years on top of that?

sa*k*r*k*r*d*001さん:

I’m entirely for supporting female employment. However, if you think about the actually contents, they are too superficial. I think that if we don’t properly re-examine things, there won’t be any results.

voi*e8*22さん: 

Rather than 3 year maternity leave, [the issue is] whether they can’t pick up their kids at day-care of school if those are offered for 19 hours at most.

*みかん*さん:

What used to be a very determined movement for husbands to also be allowed to go on child-care leave has now become hazy. If they try to get rid of waiting times for day care, this will only raise the price of nursery schools and will fail to target the real problem.

さくら海老さん:

Women’s employment rates will decrease.

nox*hfe*oさん:

It won’t make a difference whether they are actually able to do it or not. It’s pleasant because it’s the type of thing they say to look good in front of the House of Councilors.

おかまのビンタさん:

I think they should just give up and let the birth-rates fall, then there will naturally be no waiting time as the number of school-age kids falls.

Share This Article
Help us maintain a vibrant and dynamic discussion section that is accessible and enjoyable to the majority of our readers. Please review our Comment Policy »
  • Seriously, japanese companies should at least try and improve the working culture if they want to make it easier for women in workplace and help them with birthrate.

    No more unpaid overtime. Allow employees to leave before the boss does. No more nomikais. Hell, imagine how much money would be saved if they implement all of this.

    Real change starts from the workplace. The women’s right movement in the US back in the 60’s came as a result of a growing relaxed workplace which helps empower women into the work culture. If Japan really wants more women to work and also make more babies in the balance, then Japanese companies should try and do cost-saving techniques like reducing nomikais, allow employees before bosses do (Or tell bosses to work outside the office after 5pm), and at least allow some sort of pay for over time.

    I work for an IT startup which also deals with Japanese clients, and while my office is small and shabby, at least it’s a heaven compared to my Japanese clients and i’d rather work at my current place where i’m able to finish work by 5 or 6 and have some fun with friends and family instead of staying at the office until 9pm and being forced to drink with my boss after that.

  • Mighty

    I think he meant ‘Have sex with fellow female co-workers to advance the Japanese people’.

    • A Gawd Dang Mongolian

      Do your part for Japan! Increase the Japanese workforce by having plenty of babies!

      • Mighty

        Meet today’s demand first. In 30 years, Japan can adopt a “One Child Policy”.

  • wafflestomp

    THREE fucking years of leave? Overkill much?

    • Tsuhna

      Actually, we have three years of paid leave for mothers in Finland… Plus dad also gets a few months of holiday. And free health care for those giving birth with constant check-ups and advise from doctors. The system works well, I don’t see why they couldn’t have three years of leave in Japan. It might even be useful to get the birth rate go upwards.

      • Mighty

        Scandanavian countries are the wealthiest so I guess their subjects receive the full benefits.

        • HaakonKL

          Finland isn’t Scandinavian though.
          Scandinavian is an ethnicity. Finns have their own culture, language, history and vodka.

          • Mighty

            Thanks for the clarification. I always thought Finland was part of the Scandinavia. What if I said Nordic countries?

          • HaakonKL

            That would be Scandinavia + Finland and Iceland.

      • Butsu

        It could work really well, but then the Japanese companies needs to change as well. I had some pregnant teachers that never came back to school because it was easier to replace them rather than wait for them to come back.

      • Thor

        We also have this in France and it works beautifully : hence the birth ratio (just under the Irish one but for different reasons).

  • Zappa Frank

    they should just follow the actual working regulation and give up with all the working customs good for the company but not for workers.. leave late, overtime work and so on..
    3 years aren’t a solution at all, first who is going to pay a salary for 3 years of childcare? the company? unlikely… the government?japan has a debt that is already 200% of the Gdp…
    than after 3 years without working there’s a huge lack of experience, after 3 years everything is changed at work.. is like to have a freshman instead of an experienced person..

  • Would be nice if the idea of child-raising wasn’t placed solely on the woman… Just sayin’.

    • Mighty

      Don’t you mean “child bearing”?

      • No because dudes can’t bear babies….

        • Mighty

          I wasn’t aware of that.

    • Rick

      Would of made sense if you were talking about japan 30 or 40 years ago. I see more fathers taking care of their child nowadays while the mothers don’t even work. Instead, what many mothers do is go out drinking at bars on the weekends and complain about “gender equality”. Look at the statistics, its mostly males that commit suicide from stress and overworking while its mostly MOTHERS who commit child abuse on their kids. Japan surely isn’t like what it supposed to be like 40 years ago, females have gotten lazy and spoiled. Japan is a hell on earth for guys once they get married.

      • I’m Just going strictly by how this article is worded which still implies the child raising is still more so the mom’s responsibility. Even after they give birth. So I don’t see this “statistics” in which you claim.

        • Mighty

          The article also didn’t say men don’t need to support in raising children as most men’s responsibility falls financially.

          • Well that’s the so-called gender role. Men work to support the household, women stay home and raise them. But the responsibility shouldn’t be placed on one sole gender. Just going by the article, it seems women are the ones more than often taking maternal leave. They’re the ones quitting work to raise the child. It takes more than financial responsibility to raise a child. Heck, separated parents can pay child support but that is in no way meaning that’s raising. Increasingly these days, both parents are needed to work to support a family but the article doesn’t mention anything about men quitting work or saying they think child leave should be more than ay ear. Still, it implies it’s the responsibility that a woman is to be the one to care for the child.

          • Mighty

            It’s all about physiology and sociology plus certain cultures that cater to the notion of male superiority. Japan has come a long way but it’s still quite a male chauvinistic nation.

            To put it bluntly: If men have milk filled breasts I’m sure we will require maternity leaves from work to raise children.

          • Well I already know that, but even though Japan is still patriarchal society, other countries, especially those in the West, still have similar notions too. But just because a mom can breast feed (which not every woman does) still doesn’t mean the responsibility should be placed on her. Still takes a sperm for a baby to be made. I really do wonder if a dude lactated, would he get paternal leave anyway…

          • Mighty

            Well, hang in there. Women are becoming more and more on equal footing with men in so many areas from CEO’s to Governors and Mayors. We had a first female police chief and the current fire chief is also a woman. It’s just a matter of time before men start taking maternity leave too.

  • linettee lee

    it’s nice to get paid while going off to have babies, but not realistic. How many private companies can afford to pay for three years or even one year maternity leave pay. This kind of law will only make more company not want to hire women and want men instead. The woman and her husband should decide what’s more important. The wife should just quit her job when it’s time for children. At one point she will have to make that decision in her life. Her career or her kids. The japan gov’t can however offer tax incentive or bonuses for women who want to be stay home mom or work part time base on her household income. Sort of like a welfare to help the expenses of raising kids. They have welfare for poor people and old people so why not for kids.

  • G$

    I wish the US weren’t so far at the opposite end of the spectrum

  • god

    3 years paid leave? thats crazy. why not make it a complete profession. a child birthing and raising job and get paid for that.

    • linette lee

      Child care is a job. A child can’t take care of him/herself. They require adult supervision and care just like an elder person. You can send the child to daycare just like send the geriatric person to a nursing home. Or hire a babysitter for the child just like hire a home attendant for the old person. Either way you need money to do such. So a child should be entitled to receive welfare just like old people…..if you want to increase birthrate.

    • linette lee

      In the old days, husbands used to hire their wives to take care of the kids. It was called “bring home the bacon.” The kids get a babysitter aka mom at home and the wife doesn’t work outside for a salary to feed herself….well she doesn’t get a salary from her husband but he provides her with foods and other stuff in exchange for her work as babysitter and home care.

      Now in today’s society with the cost of living so high both husband and wife have to work. Most can’t afford living on one salary and have kids especially in major cities. Most wives are reluctant to give up her career and salary to have kids. Being childless is really not a problem at all. This world is overpopulated anyway. But Japan is having a crisis with really low birthrate. So I guess their gov’t should start putting in funds for financial aid in that area.

  • hivioiql

    EMD8 Recently i would be so very down on money and debts were killing me from all sides! that was UNTIL I decided to generate money.. on the INTERNET. I landed on surveymoneymaker d.o.t net, and started filling in surveys for cash, and YES, i’ve been really more able to pay my bills!! i am very happy that i did this! – iTb

  • Pingback: Gender and Japan’s Stagnation, Or, Why Gender Studies Really Matter | The Past Speaks()

Personals @ chinaSMACK - Meet people, make friends, find lovers? Don't be so serious!»